AIM University Group

Learning Outcome 1: Incomplete
No submission

Learning Outcome 2: Incomplete
No submission

Learning Outcome 3: REFERRED
AC 3.1 — Pass
Brianna, your five definitions — ecotourism, tour operator, guesthouse, culinary tourism, and DMO — are all accurate and each one is linked to Pelican Cay with a relevant example. AC 3.1 is passed.

AC 3.2 — Pass
Your airport analysis correctly identifies the unpaved runway and poor internal roads as the two core barriers, with runway upgrading as the practical solution. The tour operator versus travel agency distinction is clear and well applied to Pelican Cay. Your two tourism experiences — the rainforest waterfall hike and the Saturday fish market — are realistic and grounded in the island's assets. The homestay recommendation is the right call for Pelican Cay's scale and community-benefit goal. AC 3.2 is passed.

AC 3.3 — Referred
Your Q4 comparisons are present but thin, with limited Pelican Cay application. Q5 is the critical weakness — you correctly prioritise the airport and mention travel agencies, but the response stops there. Tourism product development, hospitality planning, food and beverage, chain reaction analysis, and mitigation strategies are all missing. The systems-thinking requirement was not met. AC 3.3 is referred.

Learning Outcome 4: Incomplete
No submission