AIM University Group

Grade Details

Last updated: July 16, 2025

Student: Shantell Moore

Course Information

Semester: Spring 2025

Course Unit: L4 THM230903 Airport and Airline Passenger Services: Quality Management Approaches

Course Grade: PASS

Grade Overview

Quiz Completion: Pass
Test Grade: Pass
Term Paper Grade: Pass

Term Paper Feedback

Learning Outcome 1: Pass

"AC 1.1 – Three Milestones in Aviation History
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
You identified the Wright Brothers’ flight, the Jet Age, and the Airline Deregulation Act as key milestones. These were relevant and well explained. However, clarity and sentence flow could be improved in some areas. For example, separating ideas into paragraphs and fixing run-on sentences would enhance readability.

AC 1.2 – Airline Deregulation Act and Jet Engine Impacts
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
The Deregulation Act was explained accurately with positive and negative effects addressed. The impact of jet engines was outlined with consideration of economic and operational outcomes. However, environmental and social aspects were underdeveloped and could benefit from deeper critical analysis and supporting data.

AC 1.3 – Stakeholders in Aviation
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
Roles of the FAA and IATA were explained, with appropriate examples of licensing, advocacy, and operational standards. You missed referencing ICAO or EASA, which are key international regulatory bodies. Future submissions should include multiple stakeholders for broader evaluation.

AC 1.4 – Aviation Disaster and Regulatory Change
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
You selected the Hindenburg disaster, which is a valid example. You demonstrated how it led to regulatory changes regarding hydrogen use and broader safety measures. A more contemporary example (e.g., Tenerife, or Air France 447) may have allowed for more aviation operations-related analysis.

AC 1.5 – Post-9/11 Aviation Security Changes
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
You accurately described operational changes such as cockpit reinforcement and liquid restrictions. The answer could be strengthened by discussing procedural updates, such as passenger screening technology and the role of TSA, to fully meet the criterion.


Grammar & Structure: Some awkward sentence construction and spelling errors ("phycological" instead of "psychological"), but meaning is clear.

Referencing: Minimal referencing noted. "Alluringworld.com" was the only reference listed. This is insufficient for Harvard-style referencing."

Learning Outcome 2: Pass

"AC 2.1. You effectively discussed the importance of terminal design for efficient processing and organization. Your reference to Atlanta’s parallel runways was especially valuable in showing real-world understanding. These examples show your ability to connect theoretical knowledge to actual airport infrastructure.

AC 2.2. You demonstrated a strong understanding of how regulatory bodies impact operations, and your discussion of staff training covered essential areas such as cultural sensitivity and crisis response. These are critical components of airport safety and service delivery.

AC 2.3. Your inclusion of the challenges older passengers face with self-service kiosks and the technology used at Shanghai Airport demonstrated critical thinking. You also acknowledged both the advantages and limitations of technology, which shows a balanced perspective.

AC 2.4. Your answers were well-structured and clearly written, with a strong focus on airport safety, quality assurance, and customer service. Your detailed response on staff training was a standout—comprehensive and aligned with industry best practices."

Learning Outcome 3: Pass

"Task 1: Organisational Responsibilities
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: Supports 3.1

You clearly outlined the roles of Flight Operations, Cabin Crew, and Ground Operations, with appropriate emphasis on safety, service, and efficiency. Despite some minor language issues, your content shows a good understanding of each department’s function in ensuring safe and smooth airline operations, aligning well with the operational protocols component of 3.1.

(Pass)

Task 2: Impact of Poor Crew Scheduling
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: Supports 3.2a

You correctly identified two consequences of poor scheduling—negative service perception and operational delays. These are practical and relevant, showing awareness of how crew planning impacts passenger satisfaction and airline performance. This supports 3.2a, which involves evaluating safety culture and crew-related issues.

(Pass)

Task 3: In-Flight Services and Amenities
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: Supports 3.3a

You listed personalization, entertainment, and menu variety as amenities, and linked them to passenger comfort. This demonstrates a clear understanding of customer-focused service features and how they enhance the travel experience, satisfying the intent of 3.3a.

(Pass)

Task 4: Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: Supports 3.3a

Your definition of CRM was correct, and your example of using customer data to identify trends was appropriate and realistic. This reflects a solid grasp of how airlines apply CRM to improve personalization and customer loyalty, which fits the criteria of 3.3a.

(Pass)

Task 5: Quality Control and Assurance
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: Supports 3.2b

You discussed performance monitoring and staff training as quality control methods, tying them to real operational practices. These demonstrate awareness of how airlines assess and maintain service quality, supporting the evaluation and implementation goals of 3.2b.

(Pass)

Essay Q1: Crew Training and Quality Service
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criteria Addressed: 3.1 and 3.2a

You linked training to staff competence, safety, and service delivery. Emergency response and continuous learning were also discussed with appropriate examples. Despite some repetition, the structure and depth of understanding support both operational protocols and safety training, covering the expectations of 3.1 and 3.2a.

(Pass)

Essay Q2: Quality Assurance and Feedback Systems
Grade: Pass
Assessment Criterion Addressed: 3.2b

You effectively explained feedback collection methods (surveys, social media, direct feedback), and quality strategies (monitoring, training, corrective action). The content is clear and relevant, even with some repetition. You also proposed practical improvement suggestions, meeting 3.2b’s requirement to evaluate and recommend enhancements to quality systems.

(Pass)

3.3b – Passenger Experience and Visual Engagement
Although no formal visuals were presented, your written work consistently focused on how services improve passenger experience. This fulfills the intent of 3.3b in written format by explaining the positive outcomes of operational strategies.

(Pass – written context accepted)"

Learning Outcome 4: Pass

4.1."PASS |

You did a good job of designing and explaining your quality improvement plan for Spirit Airlines. You’ve correctly identified the issue of inconsistent in-flight customer service, which is a common challenge in many airlines. Your strategies are well thought out, particularly the introduction of duty sheets, standardized training programs, and a reward program. The integration of technology is also a strong addition. The action steps are generally clear, especially the weekly checking of duty sheets and the introduction of the reward program over time. Overall, your plan is heading in the right direction, and with more detail in the strategies and outcomes, it would be a very solid improvement plan. Well done!"

4.2. Individual Written Report (AC 4.2)
Grade: Pass
Feedback:
Your report builds logically on the group work with expanded strategies for training, accountability, and operational streamlining. You effectively restated the problem and integrated SMART goals with actionable timelines. Performance metrics are clearly defined and align with the improvement goals (e.g., 90% positive feedback, 50% reduction in complaints). The justification demonstrates your grasp of continuous improvement principles, and your reflection on how group discussions shaped your final plan was thoughtful.

Minor issues included:

Some grammatical errors and run-on sentences (e.g., “lock of inflight” should be “lack of in-flight”).

Harvard-style referencing should be formatted properly (e.g., author, year). The source list was present but needs proper citation formatting."

Test Scores

LO1:

Pass

LO2:

Pass

LO3:

Pass

LO4:

Pass
Scroll to Top